Laserfiche WebLink
<br /> The specific approach will be determined after consultation with <br /> management, and after data gathered during the Job Description phase has been <br /> examined. Briefly, one approach is as follows: <br /> A. We will work with the Personnel Department and City Management to <br /> determine the specific job evaluation system(s) and the compensable factors <br /> which will be utilized. <br /> B. The jobs are evaluated by a committee having the professional input of pre- <br /> eval~ation by Waters, Trego & Davis, lnc.. We would train the evaluation <br /> committee and monitor the evaluations to insure Quality control. The initial <br /> evaluations would focus on key benchmark jobs. After they are approved, the <br /> remainder of the jobs would be evaluated, using the benchmarks as reference <br /> points. The job evaluation committee should have 8 to 10 members, selected <br /> by management, who are objective, analytical, have experience in the City, <br /> and who as a group know the work of the organization. <br /> C. The recommendation of the committee are then presented to management. <br /> Using statistical methods and computer assistance, the recommendations and <br /> management input are analyzed. The output is an evaluation system that <br /> blends sound compensation practices with the collective organization value <br /> hierarchy. <br /> The final result will be placement of all jobs in a hierarchy of grades that <br /> reflects the relative worth of each job to the organization. We will custom design a <br /> microcomputer software package for the City job evaluation process calculations. We <br /> will train key staff members to utilize the software for future evaluations and re- <br /> eval ua tions. <br /> 4-5 <br />