Laserfiche WebLink
<br /> Th~ Ct_ti~~n .A.gv~~9-IT-Commi tj~-~-~-~~n <br /> (Revised, January 21, 1986) <br />This document summarizes the actions of the Citizen Advisory <br />Committee from its first meeting, July 9, 1984 to November <br />6, 1985. The Citizen Advisory Committee was created on June <br />15, 1984 "to advise the Council on solutions to problems" <br />that lead to the declaration of moratoria in two areas of <br />the City. Those problems included (1) development occurring <br />that was not in accord with the Master Plan, (2) the <br />degradation of valuable environmental resources by <br />insensitive development, (3) inadequate sewerage capacity to <br />serve new development, (4) low water pressure and lack of <br />adequate water facilities to serve new development, (5) poor <br />drainage, (6) traffic problems, and (7) increased cost to <br />the public and private sector caused by new development. <br />The Citizen Advisory Committee focused on three geographic <br />areas as shown on the attached map; the Priority I area, an <br />area north and west of San Marcos, north of the University <br />in the Hill Country, the Priority 2 area, also known as the <br />Barbara Drive area in near southeast San Marcos, and the San <br />Marcos River. While the Committee's actions were focused on <br />these areas, their planning area included all of San Marcos <br />and its extraterritorial jurisdiction within two miles of <br />of the City. Its recommendations affect this entire area. <br />To solve growth related problems the Committee applied the <br />following general strategies and techniques: <br />(I) Environmental protection based on detailed studies, <br />(2) Public-private partnership to fund infrastructure <br /> improvements, <br />( 3) Long range planning of major capital improvements, <br />(4) Regulatory revision that (a) constrains insensitive <br /> development,(b) provides incentives for sensitive <br /> development, and (c) is more sensitive to design <br /> related solutions, flexibility, and the mitigation of <br /> short term or isolated ne~ative economic impacts of <br /> more stringent regulations, <br />(5) Long range land use master planning structured around <br /> the intrinsic environmental attributes of the land, <br /> preservation of neighborhood and community-wide <br /> character, and promotion of flexible development <br /> responses to the real estate market, and to the need <br /> for maximization of the land's potential. <br /> The committee's actions and recommendations were made <br /> based on and within the guidelines of the San Marcos <br /> Master Plan. Their work represents a more detailed <br /> examination of problems and geographic areas, resulting <br /> in more definitive solutions than the Master Plan had <br /> (or should have) proposed or directed. <br />