Laserfiche WebLink
<br />for aviation-related development. It would be desirable to explore <br />the possibilities of a land exchange or trade. In any case, the <br />constraints placed upon the airport by continued utilization of <br />aircraft apron and flight line facilities could be a factor in the <br />years to c:xxne. <br /> <br />..,~~ AreI!Is M:iaoent to the AiJ;part <br /> <br />Texas statutes prohibit county zoning at the present time. Since <br />much of the land adjacent to the San Marcos Municipal Airport is <br />currently outside the city limits of San Marcos or any other <br />incorporated community, there appears to be no viable means to cxmtrol <br />land uses and urban development around the airport. This is a <br />constraint, in that it does not permit the City to fully control <br />airport devel.opDent. The si tuaticm is further complicated by the fact <br />that the airport is located in a different (X)lU'lty than the City of San <br />Marcos and that flight tracks and awroac:h zooes are also located in a <br />different county. 1be OCW1SUltants recognize the multi-jurisdictional <br />nature of the airport area as a nominal constraint; however, it can <br />become a significant factor if a well defined str~tegy for <br />implementation of the airport master plan is not included in the <br />planning effort. A carefully ccordi.nated, well publicized plan that is <br />highly visible to the public will go far in minimizing multi- <br />jurisdictional ocnflicts. <br /> <br />PIIJBiaIl QwlU...intta <br /> <br />Although no major airport or airfield expansion plans which would <br />require the a.c:x}Ui.sition of additiooal land outside of current property <br />tcurXlaries are visualized, it should be recognized that the airport is <br />not large enough to become a major air carrier/air transportation <br />facility without major land acquisition. '!his does not suggest that <br />arty such plan is under consideration by the consultant. <br /> <br />'1!lere are, however, physical oonstraints on all sides of the airport. <br />en the north is State Highway 21, an essential service artery which <br />cannot be easily relocated without making dramatic changes in the <br />charact:er of the envi.ra1s, and without substantial land acquisitions <br />for right-of-way. Alt:OOu9h some development is possible along Highway <br />21, it would be restricted to those kinds of activities that can be <br />caxlucted in facilities of relatively modest scale . <br /> <br />(1) Due to the proxi.mi.ty of State Highway 21 to Runway 04-22, there <br />exists a transitional airspace surface which slopes upward at a <br />ratio of 1 vertically to 7 horizontally. This surface covers <br />much of the available land between Runway 04-22 and Highway 21. <br /> <br />2.2 <br />