Laserfiche WebLink
Regular Meeting August 21, 2007 Page 10 <br />Mr. Guerrero moved for adoption of Ordinance, and Mr. Thomaides seconded <br />the motion. Mr. O'Leary stated due to the increased cost of transformers <br />combined with current retail expansion, the Electric Utility transformer <br />budget has been depleted. He stated the City is still facing supply and <br />demand issues related to the hurricane season of 2005. At this time <br />suppliers are quoting a 42 week delivery time on most transformers. In <br />order to serve our customers, it will be necessary to transfer these funds <br />to insure delivery of product to meet the needs of current and future <br />development. Mr. Bose inquired to the number of transformers this amount <br />will buy. Bob Higgs, Director of San Marcos Utility, stated this will <br />purchase 20 transformers. The Council then voted unanimously for adoption <br />of the Ordinance on emergency. <br />Mayor Narvaiz introduced a discussion regarding Wastewater Winter Average <br />System and direction to Staff. Mr. O'Leary provided a powerpoint <br />presentation. He stated if Council wants to pursue, then Staff will need to <br />bring an Ordinance to the Council. Mr. Guerrero inquired to the examples <br />used for the data and how would it affect retired residents. Mr. O'Leary <br />stated the data was from small households which do not use a lot of water. <br />Ms. Robertson inquired to whether there was an appeal process. Mr. O'Leary <br />stated there would be an appeal process in the Ordinance and adjustments can <br />be made. Mr. Thomaides inquired to a wet winter and then a dry summer, <br />which creates a situation where people are paying extra low bills. Mr. <br />O'Leary stated there could be a dry winter, where people water and would pa <br />higher Water /Wastewater bill. Mr. Thomaides stated the goal is to be <br />revenue neutral and he inquired to whether rates would need to be raised. <br />Mr. O'Leary stated the City hired HDR Engineering, they believe it is not <br />necessary to raise the rates. He stated the Council may choice to raise the <br />cap from 8,000 to 9,000. He also stated eventually the Council may not want <br />to have a cap at all. Mr. Bose inquired to whether there is a rate increase <br />at 8,000 gallons. Tony Bagwell, HDR, stated the rates are uniform. He <br />stated whether the user is using 1,000 gallons or 8,000 gallons, they will <br />be paying the same. Mr. O'Leary stated these rates were done from this <br />year's data, or Council could wait and implement next year. Mr. Thomaides <br />stated he would prefer to use last years' data. He encouraged Council to <br />view these rates every two years. Mr. Jones inquired to whether this would <br />impact residential users or business customers. Mr. O'Leary stated this <br />does not apply to business or commercial accounts. Mr. Jones inquired to <br />whether the Council would raise the cap before we raise the rates. Mr. <br />O'Leary stated raising the cap before raising the rates is always an option. <br />Mr. Thomaides inquired to the cost of raising the cap. Mr. O'Leary stated <br />if the cap was set at 10,000 it would cost $10 a month and if the cap was at <br />9,000 the cost would be $6 to $7 a month. The Council agreed by consensus <br />to implement what Staff recommended. <br />