My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
04251988 Regular Meeting
San-Marcos
>
City Clerk
>
01 City Council Minutes
>
1980 s
>
1988
>
04251988 Regular Meeting
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/6/2007 11:40:28 AM
Creation date
12/2/2003 2:38:41 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Clerk
City Clerk - Document
Minutes
City Clerk - Type
Regular Meeting
Date
4/25/1988
Volume Book
91
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
10
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />54 <br /> <br />Regular Meeting <br /> <br />April 25, 1988 <br /> <br />Page 3 <br /> <br />Hankins reviewed the Ordinance with the Zoning Commission two weeks <br />previously and the amendments attached are a result of that meeting. <br />He stated one amendment that was left off is adding restaurants (food <br />service establishments) to the 1000 feet distance. The only area of <br />the City which could allow S.O.B.s is in the area of Lowman Airfield. <br />He stated he does not think this Ordinance will attract new S;O.B. <br />businesses to our City and that the three inexistence would have to <br />relocate within a year as provided for in the Ordinance. He stated <br />this Ordinance was built on the Dallas Ordinance and is written in <br />such a manner to hold up in Court. (Mr. Farr present at this time <br />8:20 p.m.). He stated the fee charged must be justified. He stated <br />the Staff could review the fee to see if all costs involved ~re in- <br />cluded. He stated much Staff time will be involved in appeals. He <br />stated the Zoning Commission wants to have a public hearing and recom- <br />mendation process and that all information on applications is a public <br />record. He stated the Ordinance will affect pornography. Addie <br />Cogdale stated she is a senior citizen and does not want this filth <br />in San Marcos. She said we should stand up as Christians. She said <br />when and where are we going to put a stop to this. Mr. Hankins advised <br />that the Supreme Court will not allow us to prohibit S.O.B.s, only to <br />regulate them. Rick Hernandez asked if the distance of 1500 feet <br />would shrink the area. Mr. Hankins stated we would be required to <br />have an area commercially viable. He stated it would be a constitu- <br />tional problem regulating what S.O.B.s are allowed to sell but that <br />some things are covered by State law. Rod McGlothlin asked if the <br />definition of S.O.B.s would include the selling of magazines at con- <br />venience stores and book stores. Mr. Hankins stated the Zoning Commis- <br />sion did not want them included. Ollie Giles stated the City fought <br />a prison locating here but the City is now allowing pornography. No <br />one else wished to speak, so Mayor Younger closed the public hearing. <br />Mr. Guerra moved to approve the Ordinance on first reading and Mr. <br />Brown seconded the motion. Mr. Hernandez moved to amend the Ordinance <br />to include the amendments cited in Mr. Hankins memorandum to the Council <br />dated April 19 and Ms. Kissler seconded the motion, which passed unani- <br />mously. Mr. Hernandez moved to amend Section 37-l3(a) (F) to change the <br />wording to read: "... a bar, tavern or food service establishment <br />as defined by Section ll-2(h) (2) of the Code of Ordinances;1I and Ms. <br />Kissler seconded the motion, which passed unanimously. The Council <br />then voted unanimously for approval of the Ordinance on first reading. <br /> <br />Mayor Younger introduced for consideration adoption of an Ordinance <br />on emergency, the caption which was read as follows: <br /> <br />AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SAN <br />MARCOS, TEXAS,. AMENDING THE FOLLOWING SECTIONS OF <br />CHAPTER 30, ARTICLE II, DIVISION 5, WATER SYSTEM <br />CAPITAL RECOVERY FEE: SECTION 30-61 TO REDEFINE "LUEII; <br />SECTION 30-64 TO REDEFINE "LUE"; SECTION 30-65 TO BREAK <br />DOWN THE LUE COMPUTATION FOR RESIDENTIAL USES INTO TWO <br />(2) CATEGORIES, TO AMEND THE LUE COMPUTATION FOR RESTAUR- <br />ANT/BAR, FOR HOTEL/MOTELS WITH RESTAURANT AND/OR BAR, FOR <br />LAUNDROMATS, AND FOR CAR WASHES, TO DELETE THE REFERENCES <br />UNDER "HOTEL/MOTELS WITH RESTAURANT AND/OR BARil AND "RESTAUR- <br />ANT/BAR" WITH RESPECT TO THE ASSESSMENT OF AN ADDITIONAL <br />ANNUAL FEE, TO DELETE THE REFERENCE UNDER IIINDUSTRIAL" TO <br />ANNUAL INCREASE ADJUSTMENTS IN THE CRFN, TO ADD PROVISIONS <br />FOR REASSESSMENT OF ANNUAL USAGE FEES FOR ALL NON-RESIDEN- <br />TIAL USES FOR A FIVE (5) YEAR PERIOD, TO AMEND TERMS IN <br />THE FORMULA USED FOR CALCULATION OF THE ANNUAL USAGE <br />FEES; SECTION 30-68 TO REDEFINE LUEEC; AND DECLARING <br />AN EMERGENCY. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.