Laserfiche WebLink
<br />58 <br /> <br />Regular Meeting <br /> <br />January 26, 1987 <br /> <br />Page 3 <br /> <br />AYE: <br /> <br />Brown, Coddington, Farr, Younger, Kissler, Nicola. <br /> <br />NAY: <br /> <br />Guerra. <br /> <br />ABSTAIN: <br /> <br />None. <br /> <br />Mayor Younger introduced a public hearing and approval of an Ordinance <br />on first reading, the caption which was read as follows: <br /> <br />AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SAN <br />MARCOS, TEXAS, GRANTING THE CONSENT OF THE CITY OF <br />SAN MARCOS TO THE CREATION OF A MUNICIPAL UTILITY DIS- <br />TRICT: LOWMAN RANCH MUNICIPAL UTILITY DISTRICT, SUB- <br />JECT TO VARIOUS TERMS AND CONDITIONS SET FORTH IN A <br />SEPARATE AGREEMENT CONCERNING THE CREATION AND OPERA- <br />TION OF SAID DISTRICT (CONSENT AGREEMENT) WHICH IS MADE <br />A PART OF THIS ORDINANCE, AUTHORIZING THE MAYOR TO EXE- <br />CUTE SAID AGREEMENT, AND DECLARING AN EFFECTIVE DATE. <br /> <br />Mayor Younger opened the public hearing and asked if anyone wished to <br />speak in favor of the Ordinance. Patsy Greiner passed out to the <br />Council Exhibits A, B, C, D and F and stated E is not drafted yet <br />but will say LRL agrees with the City's Phases 1 and 2 and they will <br />adopt Phases 3 and 4 of the City's Water Conservation Plan. She <br />stated the District will activate water conservation methods, such as <br />xeriscaping. Ms. Richardson stated LRL wants to be able to finance <br />through bonds any drainage that will be permitted and they want arbi- <br />tration rights regarding compliance with the City's Ordinances, and <br />that they do not want the Council's approval to stop the District from <br />proceeding. Mr. Hankins stated the Staff is seeking an agreement regard- <br />ing review time, to which Ms. Richardson responded they would be happy <br />to send the application to the City at the same time it is submitted <br />to the Water Board. Ms. Ricahrdson stated they will rewrite Section <br />5.01 (Annexation by the City) to be 20 years or 100% interhals and <br />100% their share of regional (utility construction). Mayor Younger <br />expressed concern in Section 3.03 (Water Transport Permit) regarding <br />LRL's naming the hydrologist the City will retain and stated he wants <br />it open rather than a company to be named. Ms. Richardson stated R. W. <br />Harden & Associates, Inc. is a well known groundwater hydrologist firm, <br />and that LRL wants approval of the person to be used. Mr. Guerra stated <br />he would like Section 3.03 (Water Transport Permit) to be revised to <br />state the City will attempt to obtain the permit and the City will <br />retain a water hydrologist rather than specifically naming a company <br />the City must use. Mayor Younger expressed concern regarding the <br />wording in Section 3.08(b) regarding the Project Manager, to which <br />Mr. Gonzalez stated we want more control. Ms. Richardson stated this <br />portion could be worked out. Mr. Nicola was not satisfied with the <br />language of Section 3.01 (General Statement) regarding the regional <br />facilities, as noted in Mr. Hankins' memorandum (attached to these <br />minutes). Mayor Younger stated Section 3.12 (Water and Wastewater <br />Rates and Billing) wherein LRL's rates are the same as in-city rates <br />is too restrictive. Mr. Hankins stated a possible revision could <br />differentiate the source of water rGther than in and out of city <br />customers. Mr. Gonzalez stated the City would be providing the whole <br />system to this area, which would make it possible for the City to <br />charge LRL in-city rates, as the cost would be spread throughout the <br />system. Mr. Nicola asked for amendment to Section 1.04 (Intent of <br />Agreement) to add suggested language from Mr. Hankins' memorandum in <br />the last sentence of the Section, "The City agrees not to unnecessarily <br />use its rights of review. . . ." Mr. Farr requested this be looked at <br />before second reading. Mr. Nicola requested Section 4.01 (Park and <br />