Laserfiche WebLink
<br /> 25 <br />Regular Meeting November 8, 1993 Page 5 <br /> AYE: Moore, Hart, Morris, Guerra, Cox, Plummer. <br /> NAY: Mooney. <br />ABSTAIN: None. <br />Mayor Morris introduced for consideration Item 10.C. (7) removed from <br />the consensus agenda, adoption of a Resolution, the caption which <br />was read as follows: <br /> A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SAN MARCOS, <br /> TEXAS, APPROVING AMENDMENT NO. ONE TO THE OFFICE SUPPLY <br /> CONTRACT BETWEEN THE CITY AND KLIPPLE BUSINESS PRODUCTS TO <br /> SUBSTITUTE ADVANCED BUSINESS SYSTEMS, INC. AS CONTRACTOR; <br /> AUTHORIZING THE CITY MANAGER TO EXECUTE THE AMENDMENT ON BEHALF <br /> OF THE CITY AND DECLARING AN EFFECTIVE DATE. <br />Mr. Plummer moved for adoption of the Resolution and Mr. Moore <br />seconded the motion. The Council was advised Klipple has sold their <br />business to Advanced Business Systems, and the term of this <br />agreement will be for three months. The Council voted unanimously <br />for adoption of the Resolution. ,~ <br />Mayor Morris introduced a discussion regarding the Moore <br />disannexation request (47.24 acres in the 2000 Block of Ranch Road <br />12) and direction to Staff. During a prior discussion of this <br />matter earlier in the year Staff was directed to work out a <br />compromise with the Moores which would not disturb the ETJ. The <br />city Council then made a determination not to disannex the property. <br />Mr. Plummer stated he did not think the Moores were getting fair <br />city services. Mr. Gilley reviewed with Council the existing water <br />and wastewater lines in the area and the location of a water line <br />that will be completed in the near future. He stated utilities can <br />be made available through the city's utility extension policy. <br />During the Master Plan Update, annexations will be reviewed. Staff <br />originally recommended to the Council the property not be disannexed <br />because the city would lose ETJ control and zoning. Other City <br />services, including police, fire, parks and streets are available to <br />the Moores. Greg Moore stated the burdens placed on them are high <br />for hill country ranch land and it is not feasible for them to <br />receive utility services. It was consensus of Council to disannex <br />the property leaving a ten-foot strip to keep our existing ETJ <br />control in place. The Moores agreed to pay the surveyor's fee, and <br />the City assume the cost if the Ordinance does not pass, and Mr. <br />Taylor will prepare a letter agreement for the Council's <br />consideration. <br />Mayor Morris introduced a discussion regarding Southwest Texas <br />Aviation's proposed expansion at the San Marcos Municipal Airport <br />and direction to Staff. The Airport Commission has discussed <br />this matter. Allyn Gill advised the Council the Airport Commission <br />received information upon arriving at their last meeting and did not <br />have enough to time act. Mr. Gill was concerned with the future <br />cash flow information that was presented by Bill White. Mr. Gilley <br />advised the Council Southwest Texas Aviation wants to build a new <br />building for expansion of their business, a hangar facility to be <br />owned by the City and leased for twenty years. He stated seven <br />years remain on the lease of the existing hangar, and then the <br />building becomes the city's. Mr. Stallings wants to enter into a <br />lease at this time on the old hangar for an additional thirteen <br />years over and above the seven years remaining on the lease. Bill <br />White advised the Council he has negotiated a rate with Southwest <br />Texas Aviation, and the City has a viable Lessee and would acquire a <br />building in the future. The proposed new hangar would be funded <br />through the Department of Commerce, and those funds are rapidly <br />depleting. Mr. white stated the existing hangar is appraised at <br />$24,000.00 and the new building is estimated to appraise at about <br />$100,000.00. In the year 2013 the city would own and be able to <br />lease this hangar. The new hangar would accommodate larger planes <br />than the existing hangar. The new hangar would create four new jobs <br />within a two-year period. Mr. Gill stated he is not in favor of a <br />buy-out on the existing hangar. He stated it is a bad precedent and <br />