My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
04281997 Regular Meeting
San-Marcos
>
City Clerk
>
01 City Council Minutes
>
1990 s
>
1997
>
04281997 Regular Meeting
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/11/2007 2:50:44 PM
Creation date
11/26/2003 5:02:01 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Clerk
City Clerk - Document
Minutes
City Clerk - Type
Regular Meeting
Date
4/28/1997
Volume Book
128
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
14
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />134 - <br />Regular Meeting April 28, 1997 Page 6 <br />stated the Ordinance change does not take care of this problem. Mr. Taylor stated this <br />Ordinance has been strict about the percentage of meetings missed during a year and it <br />was explained to the Council then. Mr. Taylor stated there is another provision which deals <br />with three absences in a row and those only count against you if the absences are <br />voluntary and not if they are excused. Mr. Taylor stated the percentage of meetings <br />missed during a year is very strict whether the absences are voluntary or excused and they <br />all count against that percentage. Mr. Taylor stated the percentage of meetings missed <br />in a year was intended to be strict. Ms. Hughson stated her point is whether it is an <br />excused or unexcused absence if they are not there, they are not serving. Ms. Hughson <br />stated they may need to change the 20% but part of the deal, was to take the load off the <br />chair of the board or commission from having to decide excused or unexcused when <br />"excuse" to some chairs was they remembered to call in before the meeting. Ms. Hughson <br />stated regardless of them not being there they are not serving and that is the bottom line. <br />Mr. Hart stated he shared Ms. Hughson's concern of trying to conduct business when <br />members don't attend. Mr. Hart suggested trying the Ordinance for awhile. On roll call the <br />Ordinance passed unanimously on second reading. <br />Mayor Pro-Tem Hernandez introduced for consideration approval of an Ordinance <br />on second reading, the caption which was read as follows: <br /> AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SAN <br /> MARCOS, TEXAS, CREATING A BIRD SANCTUARY, REGULATING <br /> CONDUCT IN CITY PARKS, BROADENING PARK RANGER AUTHORITY, <br /> AND DELEGATING AUTHORITY TO SET CERTAIN PARK USE FEES TO <br /> THE CITY MANAGER OR PARKS AND RECREATION DIRECTOR, BY <br /> AMENDING CHAPTER 58 - PUBLIC FACILITIES, PARKS AND <br /> RECREATION, SECTIONS 58.026, 58.030, 58.032, 58.036 AND ADDING <br /> SECTIONS 58.037,58.038,58.039,58.040,58.041,58.042 AND 58.070; <br /> INCLUDING PROCEDURAL PROVISIONS; AND PROVIDING FOR <br /> PENAL TIES. <br />Mr. Mihalkanin moved approval of the Ordinance on second reading and Mr. Hart <br />seconded the motion. Ms. Hughson moved to amend Sec. 58.030(a)(3) to delete the <br />clause which states "and be reckless about whether another may be present who will be <br />offended or alarmed by the act" and in 58.038(b) last line to strike out the word <br />"department" and insert the word "city". Mr. Hart seconded the motion. Mr. Hart asked <br />what the difference was between intentionally and knowingly appearing nude as opposed <br />to unintentionally and unknowingly. Mr. Hart stated what came to mind was one who might <br />be under the influence and very well be out there unintentionally in the nude and for that <br />matter unknowingly. Mr. Taylor stated the reason the two terms intentionally and <br />knowingly appear in the Ordinance is they are "terms of art" in criminal law in Texas and <br />they are two of the four culpable mental states or blamable mental states that people can <br />have when they commit acts which amount to crimes. Mr. Taylor stated by including those <br />two terms they are limiting it so that instead of the four mental states, intentionally, <br />knowingly, recklessly or with criminal negligence, only intentionally or knowingly appearing <br />nude would be an offense. Mr. Taylor stated alcohol intoxication is not a defense in Texas <br />to any criminal activity and it can be used to litigate the punishment but it can't be used in <br />determining whether someone had or lacked a culpable mental state. Mr. Guerra stated <br />he thought they had removed Sec. 58.039. Mr. Taylor stated changes were made to take <br />out the use of the term styrofoam. On roll call the motion for Ms. Hughson's amendment ¡ <br />passed unanimously. Mr. Hart moved to delete Section 58.039 and Mr. Guerra seconded ! <br />the motion. On roll call the following vote was recorded on Mr. Hart's amendment: ¡ <br /> -_. <br />AYE: Hughson, Hart, Hernandez, Guerra, <br />NAY: Cox, Mihalkanin <br />Motion passed. <br />Ms. Hughson stated since the last meeting she had requested and received <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.