Laserfiche WebLink
<br /> - 135 <br />Regular Meeting April 28, 1997. Page 7 <br />information about bird sanctuary and she was not sure saying it is only unlawful to hunt, <br />harm, harass, etc. in a city park is enough to designate us overall in the City as a bird <br />sanctuary. Ms. Hughson moved to amend 58.041 to delete the word "park" and insert "city <br />limits". Ms. Hughson stated there were provisions in the information she received so you <br />can get rid of nuisance birds and she would rather have the City Attorney provide the <br />wording for the Council to approve on third reading. Mr. Mihalkanin asked why would <br />changing the word "park" to "city limits" make a difference. Ms. Hughson requested to <br />have Mr. Taylor check into whether the City can be a bird sanctuary if they limit it to city <br />parks. Mr. Guerra requested to check on whether the City would receive more money from <br />the State if the City did become a bird sanctuary. On roll call the motion for approval <br />passed unanimously. <br />Mayor Pro-Tem Hernandez introduced for consideration approval of an Ordinance <br />on second reading, the caption which was read as follows: <br /> AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SAN <br /> MARCOS, TEXAS, DESIGNATING A REINVESTMENT ZONE NO.9 <br /> PURSUANT TO CHAPTER 312 OF THE TEXAS TAX CODE TO INCLUDE <br /> PROPERTY COMPRISING AN AREA OF 0.860 ACRE LOCATED AT 817 <br /> IH-35 NORTH; MAKING STATUTORY FINDINGS; AND DECLARING AN <br /> EFFECTIVE DATE. . <br />Mr. Cox moved for approval of the Ordinance on second reading and Mr. Mihalkanin <br />seconded the motion. On roll call for approval of the Ordinance, the following vote was <br />recorded: <br />AYE: Hernandez, Cox, Mihalkanin, Hughson <br />NAY: Hart, Guerra <br />The motion passed. <br />Mayor Pro-Tem Hernandez introduced for consideration approval of an Ordinance <br />on second reading, the caption which was read as follows: <br /> AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SAN <br /> MARCOS, TEXAS, SETTING FEES FOR USE OF THE CITY. ACTIVITY <br /> CENTER; INCLUDING PROCEDURAL PROVISIONS; AND PROVIDING <br /> FOR PENALTIES. <br />Mr. Guerra moved for approval of the Ordinance on second reading and Mr. Hart seconded <br />the motion. Mr. Cox stated he had noticed access limits to the pool and the racquetball <br />courts. Mr. Cobb stated there were limits because they had set time for rentals and those <br />were the two facilities the City would be generating revenues from. Mr. Guerra asked if <br />everything the City will be charging and if it was leased every single day would the City <br />make money out of the facility. Mr. Gilley stated no because the cost would be more to <br />operate than would be generated. Mr. Guerra asked if Mr. Gilley understood the operation <br />of the facility always had to be subsidized by the people of San Marcos. Mr. Guerra stated <br />the $500 security deposit for a 6000 square foot meeting room was going to shock the <br />citizens. Mr. Gilley stated they did not have provisions for use of credit cards for deposit. <br />Mr. Guerra stated credit card use be considered. Mr. Guerra stated he defended the <br />proposed rates as best he could at a G.!. Forum meeting and he was not very articulate <br />in doing it. Ms. Hughson stated when she attended the Parks Board meeting the deposits <br />were discussed. Ms. Hughson stated some of the things they discussed were the costs <br />of tables and chairs and if someone went through the glass panels what those would cost. <br />Ms. Hughson stated they looked at how a little damage could go beyond the security <br />deposit. Ms. Hughson stated in defense of the board it was a factor in determining the <br />deposits. Mr. Mihalkanin stated he was in favor of adding the credit card provision. Ms. <br />Hughson asked about the lap swim times and the racquetball courts and if she was to <br />come in and play racquetball as an annual member and wanted to play on a Saturday, <br />