Laserfiche WebLink
• ATR of Final FR/EIS + comment response + report revisions <br />• Preparation of draft ROD <br />• Collectively prepare Chief's responses to IEPR comments <br />Final Report (DE Transmittal) to Chiefs Report Milestone _(5 months) <br />Once the MSC has cleared the Final FR/EIS for submittal to HQUSACE, a Division <br />Engineers Transmittal will provide the submittal package to HQUSACE for policy <br />review. The submittal package will include a draft Chief's Report, draft Chief's <br />Responses to IEPR, draft ROD and any other submittal requirement per ER 1105-2-100, <br />Appendix H, Exhibit H-7. A Civil Works Review Board (CWRB) will be held no less <br />than 6 weeks after the DE Transmittal. PDT members will be required to participate in <br />the CWRB in-person or virtually. A successful CWRB will trigger release of final <br />FR/EIS for a 30 -day supervision and administrative (S&A) review and NEPA review. <br />PDT members may be required to address any significant comments from S&A and <br />NEPA review. <br />Read-aheads and Deliverables: <br />1. Final FR/EIS to HQUSACE, including supplemental documentation <br />2. Signed Chief's Report <br />Overall Team Tasks: <br />• Update FR/EIS submittal package documentation, if required <br />• Preparations for CWRB <br />• Participate in CWRB meeting (designate PDT members for notes) <br />Measures of Progress: <br />Overall progress of the study will be measured through progress on products identified in <br />this PMP. A series of technical review meetings will occur during the study process with <br />representatives from the District, GBRA, HQ, SWD, and other agencies to identify any <br />changes to the resources designated for any portion of the study. Any changes will be <br />analyzed for their impact upon other critical functions as well as the completion date of <br />the project. Significant impacts to the project cost and/or schedule will be elevated to <br />higher administrative levels to ensure minimal disruption to the study. The P2 upward <br />reporting system will be utilized as an upward reporting tool. The USACE Project <br />Manager (PM) will utilize the USACE P2 reporting system on a monthly basis to reflect <br />project status, upcoming milestones, and any significant changes in the approved project <br />schedule and/or budget. Likewise, the P2 reporting system will contain an explanation <br />and the justification for any feasibility study cost and/or schedule impacts. P2 will also be <br />utilized to track WIK submissions by GBRA quarterly. <br />Draft PMP — XX October 2016 <br />19 <br />