Laserfiche WebLink
79 <br />Regular Meeting August 26-, 1996 Page 8 <br />the City needs more treated water. Mr. Hart stated the City pays <br />engineers to make these recommendations and he is relying on their <br />information. Jack Fairchild, President of the River Foundation, <br />stated the City is considering three water supplies: the river, the <br />City/GBRA transporting water from the Guadalupe River, and the City <br />can still pump from the Aquifer. Mr. Fairchild stated New Braunfels <br />would pump from the Aquifer in an emergency and does not need a <br />reservoir, so he does not understand why San Marcos needs a <br />reservoir when we can pump from the Aquifer. On roll.call the <br />following vote was recorded: <br />AYE: Hughson, Hart, Moore, Guerra, Cox, Hernandez. <br />NAY: Mihalkanin. <br />ABSTAIN: None. <br />Mayor Moore introduced for consideration Item 10.B.(4) removed from <br />the consensus agenda, adoption of a Resolution, the caption which <br />was read as follows: <br />A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SAN MARCOS, <br />TEXAS, APPROVING AN EXTENSION OF THE CITY'S WASTEWATER SYSTEM <br />TO SERVE THE COUNTRY HILLS MOBILE HOME PARK; AND DECLARING AN <br />EFFECTIVE DATE. <br />Mr. Hernandez moved for adoption of the Resolution and Mr. Hart <br />seconded the motion. Mr. Hart asked for clarification where the <br />line was that would service this area, and Mr. Boeker provided that <br />information. Mr. Hart discussed with the Council a policy decision <br />to provide a line to Camp Gary, and charge for this request, and <br />felt that was inconsistent. Mr. Gilley advised Mr. Hart that Camp <br />Gary is paying for their line as well. The City is paying for the <br />oversize to have more capacity to service new wastewater customers. <br />Mayor Moore agreed this is a major policy issue. Mr. Cox stated it <br />is to our advantage to have Camp Gary on our system to protect the <br />river. Mayor Moore stated in the Council's policy statement last _ <br />year and this year, Council directed to get citizens off septic <br />tanks and private wells and onto the City's system. Ms. Hughson <br />stated Mr. Gilley has pointed out the opportunity for more customers <br />in the Highway 80 area, and asked what is the potential for <br />customers if we oversized this line. Will this just be a line to <br />service this request, and should we look at the potential for new <br />customers in this area if others want to tie on. Mr. Gilley stated <br />the goal is to serve the mobile home park and the plan would not be <br />large enough to serve other developments along Post Road. Mr. <br />Gilley stated these developments are not in the City limits and <br />there is no requirement for them to be on our system. They have to <br />request to be on our system. Ms. Hughson stated if they wanted to <br />be on our system, it would be good for the opportunity to be there. <br />Mr. Boeker stated this is the first request for that area, and we <br />could look at oversizing when preparing the design. We are now just <br />looking at the request and if we want to service them. Mr. Hart <br />stated he would rather see capital recovery fees used west of town <br />in a growth area. The Council then began to discuss the Gary Job <br />Corps matter again because of the discussion arising regarding use <br />of capital recovery fees and oversizing. Mr. Guerra asked Mr. <br />Fairchild if he viewed the City's effort to assist Gary as a <br />proactive one, and Mr. Fairchild stated it is. Mr. Guerra asked Mr. <br />Gilley if in fact the Council had given direction to proceed with <br />plans for the Gary line, and Mr. Gilley advised the direction had <br />been given months before. Mr. Hart stated he does not recall the <br />issue of the oversizing and use of capital recovery fees in the <br />amount of $500,000.00 being decided. Mr. Gilley stated this is a <br />policy decision and stated there are two issues: to serve Gary Job <br />Corps which would be done at their expense, and to provide an <br />oversize line to provide additional capacity. The Council then <br />voted unanimously for adoption of this Resolution. <br />Mayor Moore introduced for consideration Item 10.3.(5) removed from <br />the consensus agenda, adoption of a Resolution, the caption which <br />was read as follows: