My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Res 2018-025/adopting the 2018 Hays County, Texas Hazard Mitigation Plan as the official plan of the City; authorizing the inclusion of the City of San Marcos Hazard Mitigation Plan as an appendix; designating the City Manager as the official authorized
San-Marcos
>
City Clerk
>
03 Resolutions
>
2010's
>
2018
>
Res 2018-025/adopting the 2018 Hays County, Texas Hazard Mitigation Plan as the official plan of the City; authorizing the inclusion of the City of San Marcos Hazard Mitigation Plan as an appendix; designating the City Manager as the official authorized
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/1/2018 9:53:43 AM
Creation date
3/1/2018 8:45:52 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Clerk
City Clerk - Document
Resolutions
City Clerk - Type
Adopting
Number
2018-25
Date
2/20/2018
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
859
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
2.3 Step 3. Analyze Risks <br />MPC planners reviewed the hazard and asset data for their communities and used the Halff Risk Ranking <br />Tool worksheet in order to obtain a quantified ranking of risk for each hazard based on: <br />Perception of RiskAnalysis of Data by Planners <br />• From the Public (via Public Survey results)• Potential for Impact on Health and Safety <br />• From Planners (via Risk Ranking Tool • Potential for Impact on Property <br />worksheet)• Potential for Impact on Business Continuity <br />Risk Rank <br />Risk Assessment <br />Public <br />Data Analysis <br /> Perception <br />Local <br />Survey FeedbackHealth & SafetyEconomic Loss <br />Engagement <br />PropertyBusiness <br /> DamageInterruption <br />Perception was ranked on a weighted scale, with public perception making up 25% of the value and <br />planner perception making up the remaining 75% of the value. Public survey result data regarding risk <br />perception by hazard was used to incorportate public input. Hazard risk ranking scores were also used <br />in the prioritization of mitigation action items in Section 3: Mitigation Strategy, within each jurisdiction <br />annex. <br />The remainder of data used for this ranking used a combination of qualitative/quantitative exposure <br />analysis and was based on planner responses to questions related to the three types of potential impact. <br />Planners had the choice of selecting High, Medium or Low rankings for each hazard. Each level had a <br />corresponding quantifiable value. <br />community? <br />Meaning <br />HighAt least 70% of the population is exposed to the hazard <br />MediumBetween 40% and 69% of the population is exposed to <br />the hazard <br />LowNo more than 39% of the population is exposed to <br />hazard <br />Meaning <br />HighAt least 50% of the total assessed property value is <br />exposed to hazard <br />MediumBetween 25% and 49% of the total assessed property <br />value is exposed to hazard <br />LowNo more than 24% of the total assessed property is <br />exposed to hazard <br />61 <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.