02112002 Regular Meeting - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

Regular Meeting February 11, 2002 79. Page 5 to have two ETJ representatives and stated there is a reverse equity issue of an ETJ representative voting on zoning matters. He wants a Charter change from two persons to one. Mr. Taylor advised this can be accomplished without a Charter change. The membership of the Planning and Zoning Commission is adopted by Council Ordinance. Mr. Taylor stated he can prepare an Ordinance amendment and understands the Council wants the ETJ representative to not have a vote on zoning matters and for there to be one ETJ representative. Mr. Taylor stated the Charter Review Commission felt strongly that the P&Z Commission should be a part of the Charter. Mr. Mihalkanin stated he is willing to amend the Ordinance promptly. Ms. Hughson moved to amend the Ordinance to remove Measure 5 and Proposition 5 and renumber the remaining propositions and Ms. Tatum seconded the motion, which passed unanimously. Ms. Hughson stated the Parks and Recreation Advisory Board and Greenbelt Alliance have indicated they want the parkland designation to remain in place for the property the Hispanic Chamber of Commerce has proposed to place their building on and lease from the City. Mr. Mayhew stated he has talked with groups that are supportive of the Hispanic Chamber of Commerce's proposal. Mr. Mayhew stated since this is dedicated parkland, is it possible to look at other public land. Mr. Mihalkanin stated this dedicated parkland should be divided into separate portions, and that some of the property in front of St. John's Catholic Church, they thought was theirs. Mr. Montoya noted the Parks and Recreation Advisory Board was split on this issue. Mr. Montoya stated St. John's Catholic Church did not realize this was not their property. Mr. Montoya stated he does not think a park will go up there as it is a small tract and many do not know it belongs to the City. He thinks the citizens should decide through voting. Mr. Cox stated when he asked earlier if this matter had been considered by the Parks and Recreation Advisory Board, it was because the Council values their opinion. The Council must decide what is the best use of this land and it raises the issue if a public building might be the best use for this property. The location is at the entrance to our City and an attractive building at this site would be a good use. Mr. Cox asked if the Parks Master Plan identifies the use for the property. Sherwood Bishop stated he is the Chair of the Parks and Recreation Advisory Board and stated he does not think we need a building or parking lot for the best use of this land. He stated there is a valuable need for greenspace and a Sesquicentennial Garden is planted on this property. Mr. Bishop stated an important consideration is the City is asking for grant funding to purchase more parkland, and it will make it difficult to apply for grant a for this purpose when the City is giving parkland away. The Parks Board has worked hard to get every acre possible, and he thinks it is important to support parkland. Ms. Tatum inquired if the Hispanic Chamber considered other locations and wanted to know if there was a particular reason this site was selected. Richard Garza, representing the Hispanic Chamber of Commerce, stated they looked at several City-owned properties for possible sites for their new building, and some sites were too small. Mr. Garza stated the proposed site in the Ordinance suited their purposes, and the City map showed this property to be zoned Public.