My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
02.02.21 Regular Meeting
San-Marcos
>
City Clerk
>
01 City Council Minutes
>
2020's
>
2021
>
02.02.21 Regular Meeting
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
4/29/2021 2:39:14 PM
Creation date
4/12/2021 9:35:39 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Clerk
City Clerk - Document
Minutes
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
24
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
City Council Meeting Minutes February 2, 2021 <br />originally established in response to these acquisitions. <br />Mayor Hughson asked how many connection requests have there been in the <br />last year. Ms. Moyer stated we have had 13 per year varied in connection and <br />extension. <br />Mayor Hughson inquired about the connection vs. extension. Ms. Mattingly <br />will provide information to council. <br />Council consensus is to move forward with the redline option language and to <br />require council approval for connections and to <br />bring forth to council at a future date. <br />16. Hold discussion on the sequence for the approval process and LDC amendments for Out <br />of City Utility Extensions; and provide direction to Staff. <br />Shannon Mattingly, Director of Planning and Development Services, asked for <br />direction regarding when the Out of City Utility (OCU) will go through the <br />approval process. <br />Ms. Mattingly is seeking direction from Council regarding a possible Land <br />Development Code amendment to change on where the OCU application <br />process will begin - if it will be before other applications are accepted. <br />Mayor Pro Tem Derrick stated she likes the annexation concurrent with zoning <br />and knowing what the developer is asking for zoning and if it acceptable for <br />the area which is the current process. <br />Ms. Mattingly asked Should the out -of -city utility request be combined with a <br />Development Agreement? Or should we require annexation and zoning any <br />time there is a out -of -city utility request? The issue is that some developers <br />want city utilities but do not want to be annexed. Mr. Taggart stated this is a <br />complex issue and the developer can opt out of our CCN at will and some <br />developers are righting permits. They do not want to be annexed because they <br />do not want to follow the LDC requirements. If they are not granted access to <br />city utilities, they say they will do a "package plant." Ms. Derrick asked Mr. <br />Taggert to explain - <br />what is a package plant? Mr. Taggart responded that it is a pre-engineered and <br />pre -configured wastewater treatment facilities that are typically unattended and <br />as with any hydraulic and/or mechanical system, can fail at times. They <br />discharge into either dry or intermittent creeks that may flow through any <br />neighborhood until they get to a river. He continued with the notation that we <br />City of San Marcos Page 19 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.