Laserfiche WebLink
237. <br />Regular Meeting February 23, 2004 Page 6 <br /> <br />A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SAN MAi{COS, TEXAS, <br />ADOPTING AN ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT INCENTIVES POLICY FOR THE CITY; AND <br />DECLARING AN EFFECTIVE DATE. <br /> <br />Ms. Narvaiz moved for adoption of the Resolution and Mr. Mihalkanin <br />seconded the motion. Mr. O'Leary stated Ms. Narvaiz has suggested some <br />amendments to this Incentive Policy. Ms. Narvaiz moved to amend Paragraph <br />3, Page 1, to add Cinco de Mayo, Paragraph 2, Page 2, to read ...provide <br />high paying jobs for San Marcos citizens and Texas State .... page 3, 3rd <br />Bullet, add San Marcos Consolidated Independent School District, and Page <br />8 by adding San Marcos Economic Development Council 512-393-5900(phone) <br /> <br />website and email address first on the list of contacts, and Mr. <br />Mihalkanin seconded, which passed unanimously. Ms. Narvaiz moved to amend <br />Page 3 Subtitle Eligibility Criteria a. to add and/or to the end of the <br />sentence, and Mr. Thomaides seconded the motion. Mr. Taylor stated he <br />does not feel 5 jobs and $50,000.00 would be unreasonable for a tax <br />abatement. Dan Rogers, Director of Economic Development, stated the <br />company would not automatically be granted a tax abatement. The Council <br />voted unanimously for the amendment. The Council then voted unanimously <br />for adoption of the Resolution. <br /> <br />Mayor Habingreither introduced for consideration Item 22 removed from the <br />consent agenda, adoption a Resolution, the caption which was read as <br />follows: <br /> <br />A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SAN MARCOS, TEXAS, <br />APPROVING A POLICY RELATED TO THE RESALE OF TAX-FORECLOSED <br />PROPERTIES; AND DECLARING AN EFFECTIVE DATE. <br /> <br />Mr. Diaz moved for adoption of the Resolution and Ms. Narvaiz seconded the <br />motion. Luanne Caraway, Hays County Tax Assessor, stated no offer less <br />than 100% of the value would be considered during a redemption period. <br />She stated within 3 months of the redemption period expiration, the Tax <br />Assessor-Collector's office would reappraise the property to determine a <br />feasible opening bid amount for a future auction. This would allow the <br />acceptance of the highest auction bid for the property, even if it is <br />lower than the market value. Carol Garcia, McCreary, Velselka, Bragg & <br />Allen, stated the redemption period is 2 years after a tax sale for <br />homestead property and 6 months for non-homestead property. She stated <br />she feels this will get property back on the tax roll. Steve Byrd, <br />Linebarger Goggan Blair & Sampson, LLP., stated this Resolution would <br />alleviate the tax firm from coming back to the Council to accept bids <br />received automatically. Mr. Montoya inquired why this Resolution is being <br />recommended. Mro Byrd stated currently when bidders see no one is bidding <br />on a piece of property at the auction, the bidder will pass over the <br />property at the public auction. He stated the bidder then will provide a <br />bid to get the property for 10¢ on the dollar. He stated with this policy <br />the bidder would have to wait until after the redemption period. Ms. <br />Garcia stated these are the properties, which would be difficult to get <br /> <br /> <br />