Laserfiche WebLink
<br />," <br /> <br />special meeting, april 22,1966 <br /> <br />page two <br /> <br />to be re-zoned before it could be used for commercial <br />purposes. Alderman Whittenberg said he had given an <br />enormous amount of thought to the matter; that $50,000 <br />was a lot of money for a church to spend. He suggest- <br />ed that the City dedicate a street giving access to <br />the church's property, and then use the remaining parts <br />of the 3.62 acres for beautification - perhaps a rose <br />garden. Edgar Ash, recognized by the Mayor, said he <br />did not think any park property should be sold. He <br />spoke several times during the evening. Mr. Ash said <br />he lived outside the City Limits, on Wimberley Road. <br />Alderman Pool said if additional park sites could be <br />purchased with money derived from the 3.62 acres, he <br />felt it would be beneficial to the City. He said he <br />approved of Mr, Whittenberg's idea, a/so. The Mayor <br />said: "Speaking as a member of the Parish Advisory <br />Board. al I the church wants is assurance that nothing <br />wi I I ever be done with that land (to mar the entrance <br />to St. John's Church)". Mr. Carney asked Father Tre- <br />vino, pastor of St. John's Church, to speak to the quest- <br />ion. Father Trevino said he had met that week with the <br />Bishop and the church's attorney. He had been advised <br />that "access" would not be satisfactory and that the <br />Bishop had decided to go ahead and face the church on <br />Riverside Drive, as the plans originally called for. <br />Alderman Froh asked if the Counci I were to dedicate a <br />street, could the next Counci I close it? Several, ans- <br />wered in the affirmative. The Mayor asked if the Counc; I <br />would consider leasing the 3.62 acres at a nominal price, <br />with the guarantee that nothing objectionable would ever <br />be done with it. Father Trevino said: "The attorney said <br />'No'". Alderman Korff said the City had had an appraisal <br />and the Council should decide what price they wish to <br />place on -the land. The Bishop is the one who wi II decide, <br />Mr. Korff said, and he should make an offer to the City. <br />The Mayor cal led attention to the fact that the appraisal <br />was made on the basis of commercial property, whereas the <br />church could not be considered in that category. Robert <br />Jay asked ~f the City sold the property, could it get <br />3 to I value from some Federal aid program. The Mayor <br />said any money from sale of park land would have to be <br />reinvested in park land. Alderman Pool commented that <br />the City needs more parks in other parts of town: "I can <br />see where we could reinvest it to advantage, but I think <br />the price is high", Dr. Pool said. Alderman Damon brought <br />up a solution that had been discussed when the matter was <br />first brought before the Counci I: a swap of land of equal <br />value. Elwood Soechting said that site was a"IOO % loc- <br />ation" for a shopping center. "My persona) opinion is <br />that I' d like the Catho I i c Church to have that property. <br />if a compromise could be worked out - if they'd agree. <br />on a basis of 10-year growth. to put a clause in that <br />they wouldn't sell for a shopping center", Mr. Soechting <br />said. Father Trevino said: "Even if it became necessary <br />to sell, I'm sure th~ church could get together with the <br />business community - that they would guarantee in writing <br />that the 3.62 acres would never be sold. We would move <br />part of the bui Iding into that area." J.B. Roberts re- <br />minded the people that in a request for a zoning change, <br />80 % of the people with~n 200 feet would have to agree to <br />the change. Father Trevino said again that he felt the <br />church could assure the City that the 3.62 acres would <br />never be sold for a shopping center - if they reserved <br />the right to sel I, say, for an apartment house. <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />I <br />