Laserfiche WebLink
<br />I <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />regu lar meeting, may 8. 1967 <br /> <br />page three <br /> <br />/,- <br /> <br />T woReso I ut ions author iz i ng the Mayor to execute quitclaim <br />deeds for property sol d at a tax sa I e were read a loud. The <br />City Manager explained the background on the two cas~s. Dr. <br />Craddock moved that the Resolutions be approved. Mr~ Flores ~ <br />~econded the motion and onrol I call, the fol lowi~g vote was <br />recorded: <br /> <br />AYE: <br />NAY: <br /> <br />Cr.addock, Damon, Flores, Ko,:,ff" Serur, Whittenberg <br />None <br /> <br />The MayoF declared the two Resolutions, attached here as a <br />part of the Min~tes, Pas~ed and Approved. <br /> <br />The Mayor reminded the Council that a Board of Equalization <br />must be appo i nted in May. The Charter requ ires a Board of ,/ <br />five members. The Mayor suggested that each members ,of the <br />Counci I present one or more names at the May 22 meeting, from <br />which five would be chosen. Mr. Serur said it should be as <br />cert~ined that the Person is wil ling to serVe, before his or <br />her n~me is proposed. Mr. Whittenberg said it was imperative <br />that the Board of Equalization stand firrnon the evaluations <br />pfaced on property by the tax appraisal firm under .contract <br />by,the City. HOtherwiseH, the Counci Iman said, Hwe .wi I I have <br />wasted our moneyon the ,surveyH. The Mayor concurred. Mr. <br />Damon sa i di twas. his understandi ng that the apprai sa I firm <br />would have a representative sitting with the Board, to give <br />specific answers to questions raised by taxp~yers. It was <br />agreed by common cons~nt that each mimber of the Council <br />wou I d presen.t. one or more names for the Board of Equa '. izat i on <br />at the May 22 meeting. <br /> <br />J.R. Cole of lockwood, Andrew~ & Newnam, gave a progress <br />report on the City's.improvement plans. He said it was of <br />utmost importance that a site for the sewage disposal plant <br />be selected, so the design could be completed. He explained <br />the importance of the time element in relation to making <br />applicat~on for Federal participation in' the cost of the <br />programs. <br /> <br />Gene Rourke, Fiscal Agent for the City, spoke on the possible <br />sale ot the bonds to finance the programs. It was brought out <br />that if the City has a higher evaluation, as is expected as a <br />result of the tax ~ppraisal, there would be abetter market for <br />the City's bonds. Mr. ~hittenberg advised that the City wait <br />to put the bonds on the market unti I after the appraisal report <br />is reviewed. <br /> <br />B.W. Klotz, of Lockwood, Andrews & Newnam, recommended that a <br />special meeting be held to discuss the ~any facets of the City's <br />improvement programs and their financing. He said his firm was <br />ready with accumulated data to discuss the coordination of the <br />sale of bonds with the schedule of improvements, but it would <br />requ i re an ent i. re even i rig for proper discuss ion. <br /> <br />It was agreed by common consent that the Counci I would meet <br />with the Fiscal Agent, Engineers and Planners on May 15. at <br />7~30 p.m. for a thorough discussion and making of decisions. <br /> <br />The Mayor read aloud a letter from the Texas Highway Department, <br />signed by J.M. Owens, Assistant Engineer for District 14, report- <br />ing on a recent traffic survey in San Marcos, see attached. <br />Mr. Wolff said he had set up a meeting of Highway Department <br />