Laserfiche WebLink
this would happen. That road was put in for getting traffic out, not traffic in. This is putting in • <br />another 2,000 people at the end of that road. He reiterated that they would not have supported <br />the extension if they had known of the proposed high density and commercialization in that area. <br />Chad Williams, 814 Bishop, presented the Council with a petition requesting the Council to not <br />allow this development. He feels there is not enough good work and transparency on behalf of <br />Craddock Developers. There are recharge features throughout this property, and the Edwards <br />Aquifer relies on this. The plan can work, just not here. <br />Tim Groenke, 805 Franklin, asked Council to deny this request. This will greatly increase traffic <br />on Bishop, Craddock and Franklin. The project violates the land use policy. He noted that two <br />out of the three neighborhoods do not have sidewalks, and this project will do nothing to <br />promote pedestrian traffic. This is bad news for the neighborhoods. The City is putting their <br />homes and the potential future of the city at risk by doing this. He doesn't want us to look like <br />Round Rock. <br />Judith Aronow, 2001 Lancaster, told the Council she moved from Beaumont, Texas from a <br />neighborhood that never changed. This controversy is widening the gap between the government <br />and the citizens. She came here because she thought the government was interested in its <br />residents. The expansion was not revealed until the plans were in place. Homeowners were <br />ignored. It appears that the City doesn't much care for the input of its taxpayers when making its <br />plans for the neighborhood. She asked why is a dense development needed in this fragile place? <br />Theresa Mitchell, 2003 Lancaster, stated her opposition to this. She put all her money into her • <br />home, and now her property values have been affected. She asked the Council to please look at <br />further consequences. We can't ignore the environment. <br />David Mendoza, 1909 Castlegate Circle, president of the Castle Forest Neighborhood <br />Association, asked if compliance is all you need, and then they can build whatever they want. <br />The association wants to provide input. They are gathering signatures for letter requesting the <br />City to create a Citizens Advisory Commission. <br />Rob Roark, 1804A Hunter Road, asked the Council to stick to the plan. People are saying they <br />want the City to stick with the plan. He agrees with the creation of a citizen's advisory panel. <br />There has to be a balance between the rights of the homeowners and the rights of the owners of <br />the land being developed, and we need to come to an agreement. He asked the Council to please <br />look at the concerns of the citizens. <br />Rich Salas, 900 Franklin, president of the Oak Heights Association, showed map depicting <br />traffic patterns on Franklin. He does have some behavior concerns if students occupy the <br />apartments. He asked the Council how many of them have read the entire master plan and <br />encouraged them to look at what it says. He is not opposed to development in San Marcos, but <br />he wants it to take place where it is supposed to take place according to the master plan. <br />Disregarding the master plan is a flagrant disrespect of due process and a disregard of the time <br />citizens have put in. This further discourages citizen involvement. Low voter turnout shows a - <br />disconnect between the citizens and the Council. <br />RM050410 Minutes Page 8 <br />