08032010 Regular Meeting - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

species. She and her husband are thankful to be stewards of this wonderful natural feature. It is unfair to subject established homeowners to such a drastic change. Jim Brotherton, 1450 Sunset Ridge, opposes the proposed moving the Loop onto McCarty. Hundreds of homes use McCarty as the primary access to their homes. This will not be beneficial for public health or safety. There is no way to keep a quality of life or minimize the safety of their families. Larry Patterson, 1400 Sunset Ridge, disagrees with the proposal to move 110 to McCarty. He believes there is a problem with the lack of transparency with moving from the original location to McCarty. The public notice does not mention CR110 or McCarty Road. The Planning and Zoning meeting agenda was equally vague. We may have met the minimum legal standards, but we fell short of notifying people. What is being proposed will change forever their quality of life. Kathie Patterson, 1400 Sunset Ridge, provided written comments, attached. Dianne Wassenich, 11 Tanglewood, stated her concern with changes based on something Carma asked them to do. The City is going beyond what it should do to bring in development. This is on top of the recharge zone and contributing zones. There are faults that run along Hunter Road, a drop fault block. Water from the aquifer travels in it like a canal. Carma mentions 69 water well immediately in the area. She assumes there are more than listed. The City is going to give $30 million for a golf course with pesticides, etc. She can't understand how our community would be so desperate to give money back through a TIRZ and move road plans to bring in development that would harm our water. Sharon Wilson, 1251 Sunset Ridge, stated she is opposed to moving 110 to McCarty. It will adversely affect backyards and some will lose front yards. Map plan 6 puts the road in her backyard. She asked the Council to consider placing this where there are no established houses. The 2002 plan has it in a portion of the Paso Robles subdivision. She suggested that the City incorporate it with the other extension of Centerpoint. Richard Duval, 1221 Sunset Ridge, said it is fine to delete the loop; however, if it is being moved to McCarty Lane, then he is strongly opposed. He bought his property and built a home five years ago. He reiterated his oppostion to any type of rerouting down McCarty. Nancy Megerson, 307 Pampas Pass, said she opposes moving 110 to McCarty. If the road goes 100' onto her property then there will be a turnstile in her sunroom. This would remove a whole lot of her backyard. Also, she need over one acre for her septic, and this would make her illegal. The neighborhood has a wonderful atmosphere, and she still has privacy. Regarding notification, she told the Council that she doesn't take the San Marcos paper so she did not get that notification, but she is affected. There is nothing that says we are moving the Loop to old McCarty Lane. When she called Planning she was told that she should be concerned with the August 17 meeting because that is when the decision is made. She said that educational material is needed. RM080310 Minutes Page 9