Laserfiche WebLink
<br />is no feasible and prudent alternative to the use of such land and such program <br />includes all possible planning to minimize harm. " <br /> <br />(7)(b) "... When there is no physical taking but there is the possibility of use of or <br />adverse impacts to Section 4(f) land, the FAA must determine if the activity <br />associated with the proposal conflicts with or is compatible with the normal <br />activity associated with this land. The proposed action is compatible ifit would <br />not affect the normal activity or aesthetic value of a public park, recreation area, <br />refuge, or historic site. When so construed, the action would not constitute use <br />and would not, therefore, invoke Section 4(f) of the DOT Act. " <br /> <br />No aspect of the proposed airport development would impact Section 4(f) properties. <br /> <br />HISTORIC, ARCHITECTURAL, ARCHAEOLOGICAL <br />AND CULTURAL RESOURCES <br /> <br />The Texas State Historic Preservation Officer (SHPO) was contacted regarding the <br />potential presence of cultural resources within the area of the proposed development. <br />In their response, the SHPO stated "We do not know of any recorded historic properties <br />within the area outlined on your map. No cultural resource investigations have been <br />conducted in the vicinity. We will need additional information to review any future <br />construction plans under the Antiquities Code of Texas and the National Historic <br />Preservation Act." Once plans become specific and are readied, the City should contact <br />SHPO with specific plans. <br /> <br />BIOTIC COMMUNITIES AND THREATENED <br />AND ENDANGERED SPECIES OF FLORA AND FAUNA <br /> <br />As part of this evaluation, the U.S. Department of the Interior, Fish and Wildlife <br />Service (USFWS) and the Texas Parks and Wildlife Department were contacted to <br />request information regarding potential impacts to threatened or endangered species, <br />species of special concern, or habitat areas of concern. <br /> <br />In their response, the USFWS did not identify any federally-listed threatened or <br />endangered species within Caldwell County. Texas Parks and Wildlife Department <br />indicated that there is a known occurrence of one special species in the general vicinity <br />of the proposed project and five (5) threatened or endangered species associated with <br />the San Marcos River. Included in the letter from Texas Parks and Wildlife was an <br />inclusive list of rare species of plant and animal life known in Hays and Caldwell <br />Counties. <br /> <br />Prior to any development, a biological survey may be needed to evaluate the types of <br />native vegetation to be disturbed by the proposed development and to determine <br />whether any impacts to the above referenced species would be anticipated. <br /> <br />A-9 <br />