09202011 Regular Meeting - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

(14) MOTION: Upon a motion made by Council Member Scott and a second by Council Member Thomason, the City Council voted (7) for and (0) opposed, to approve Resolution 2011 - 105R, as previously captioned. The motion carried unanimously. (15) MOTION: Upon a motion made by Council Member Thomason and a second by Council Member Terry, the City Council voted (7) for and (0) opposed, to approve Resolution 2011 - 106R, as previously captioned. The motion carried unanimously. (18) MOTION: Upon a motion made by Council Member Thomason and a second by Council Member Porterfield, the City Council voted (7) for and (0) opposed, to approve Resolution 2011 - 109R, as previously captioned. The motion carried unanimously. (19) MOTION: Upon a motion made by Council Member Thomason and a second by Council Member Scott, the City Council voted (7) for and (0) opposed, to approve the change in services #6, as previously captioned. The motion carried unanimously. PUBLIC HEARINGS 21. 7:OOPM Receive a Staff presentation and hold a Public Hearing to receive comments for or against Ordinance 2011 -50, approving an amendment to the Future Land Use Map from "LDR" Low Density Residential to "MU" Mixed Use for 1.1 acres, more or less, of land consisting of the lots located at 511, 517, 519 -525, 531 and 537 West Hopkins Street; amending the Official Zoning Map of the City by rezoning the lots at 511, 517, 519 -525 and 531 West Hopkins Street from "SF -4.5" Single - Family Residential District to "MU" Mixed Use District and the lot at 537 West Hopkins Street from "SF -6" Single- Family Residential District to "MU" Mixed Use District; and including procedural provisions, and consider approval of Ordinance 2011 -50. Matthew Lewis, Development Services Director, provided Council with a brief presentation on this request. Following the presentation Mayor Guerrero opened the Public Hearing at approximately 7:47 p.m. Ryan Perkins, no address provided, is outside of the 200 feet area of the properties, but a number of red flags with the entire block being proposed for a zoning change. Many of the property owners say that they don't have the intent at this time so why waste the City's tune moving forward with this process? There is not any planning in this process, just zoning. Traffic and speed are already issues and turning left and right into properties is a concern. Home offices should not be allowed; it will just lead to a domino effect. Bridgette Phillips, 529 Harvey St, stated her concerns about the safety and wellbeing of their children. She is not anti - growth, just pro- neighborhood. This area is heavily biked and walked