11152005 Regular Meeting - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

40. Regular Meeting November 15, 2005 Page 6 areas of economic distress He also stated by adoption of this Resolution the City may nominate up to four businesses as "Enterprise Projects" The Council then voted unanimously for adoption of the Resolution I Mayor Narvaiz introduced for consideration Item 20, removed from the consent agenda, adoption of a Resolution, the caption which was read as follows RESOLUTION EXPRESSING OFFICIAL INTENT TO REIMBURSE FOR CERTAIN COSTS AND EXPENSES RELATED TO (I) SURFACE WATER TREATMENT PLANT PROJECT, AND (II) PAYMENT OF PROFESSIONAL SERVICES IN CONNECTION THEREWITH, INCLUDING LEGAL, FISCAL AND ENGINEERING FEES Mr Guerrero moved for adoption of the Resolution and Mr Diaz seconded the motion Mr O'Leary stated Staff is requesting to use $905,000 00 of Water/Waterwater Utility fund balance to the preliminary design and engineering costs He stated by using fund balance, the City can extend the issuance date of the revenue bonds and the first payment date He also stated this Resolution is needed to fully reimburse the $905,500 00 used from Water/Waterwater Utility Fund balance The anticipated revenue bond issuance date is summer of 2006 The Council then voted unanimously for adoption of the Resolution Mayor Narvaiz introduced for consideration a public hearing and approval an Ordinance on first reading, the caption which was read as follows Ofl AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SAN MARCOS, TEXAS, AMENDING SECTION 1 2 6 1 OF THE CITY LAND DEVELOPMENT CODE REGARDING THE COMPOSITION OF THE HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION, INCLUDING PROCEDURAL PROVISIONS; AND PROVIDING FOR PENALTIES Mayor Narvaiz opened the public hearing and asked if anyone wished to speak No one did, so Mayor Narvaiz closed the public hearing Mr Mihalkanin moved for approval of the Ordinance on first reading, and Mr Guerrero seconded motion Mr Thomaides inquired whether the Planning and Zoning Commission and the Historic Preservation Commission discussed revisiting the Ordinance if problems arise with having no representative from Belvin Street and Dunbar historic districts Mr Van Ouderkerke stated the Historic Preservation Commission did not hold a discussion on revisiting the Ordinance in one year, but the Commission will be happy to do so if Council directs He also stated two more streets were added to the Historic District, and the Commission did not believe two more representatives were needed The Council then voted unanimously for approval of the Ordinance on first reading Mayor Narvaiz introduced for consideration a public hearing and approval an Ordinance on first reading, the caption which was read as follows Ofll