My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Res 2006-176
San-Marcos
>
City Clerk
>
03 Resolutions
>
2000 s
>
2006
>
Res 2006-176
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/6/2007 1:58:33 PM
Creation date
10/18/2006 2:19:42 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Clerk
City Clerk - Document
Resolutions
City Clerk - Type
Agreement
Number
2006-176
Date
10/17/2006
Volume Book
169
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
34
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />I <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />agencies. The Engineer will submit initial project design with permit applications at the earliest <br />possible date in a form sufficiently complete to ensure that no substantive changes will occur <br />after the submittal of permit applications. The Engineer will prepare mitigation plans and <br />recommendations for design and construction in compliance with the requirements of the <br />environmental assessment. The Engineer assumes that no significant design changes will occur <br />requiring Edward's Aquifer re-evaluation. In the event that there are changes to this assumption, <br />any additional work to accomplish these tasks will be considered additional services in <br />accordance with Section 1.8. <br /> <br />1.4.2 Review existing schematic design and right-of-way plans and the implications to design, <br />construction, and schedule and provide options and preferred approaches for minimizing impacts <br />including: <br />(a) <br /> <br />(b) <br />(c) <br /> <br />Review roadway design parameters, including, but not limited to, horizontal <br />alignment, vertical alignment, grades, retaining wall locations and pavement <br />section. <br />Review drainage impacts and design. <br />Review water quality pond location and design and other water quality issues, as <br />related to the Edwards Aquifer. <br />Provide aesthetic options for design. <br />Review proposed Purgatory Creek Bridge for improvements in construction time <br />savings, cost savings, noise reduction and aesthetic improvements. <br /> <br />(d) <br />(e) <br /> <br />1.4.3 Perform geotechnical investigations, as required, to form the basis for construction and <br />pavement design recommendations, as well as locate topographic features that may impact <br />construction including: <br /> <br />(a) <br /> <br />Bridge soil boring holes: <br />i. Purgatory Creek Bridge, estimated at 22 core borings of 40' each. <br />ii. Private Road Bridge, estimated at 2 core borings of 40' each. <br />Retaining wall boring holes: <br />i. Purgatory Creek Bridge approaches, estimated at 12 core borings of 15' each <br />ii. Private Road Bridge approaches, estimated at 8 core borings of 15' each <br />Pavement borings along Wonder World Drive, RM 12 and Craddock Extension: <br />i. 10 core borings of 5' each in easy access areas. <br />ii. 23 shallow hand auger borings along difficult access areas. <br />Lab testing for standard geotechnical classification and strength tests. <br />Geotechnical foundation design criteria for bridge drill shafts, including: <br />i. Allowable end-bearing, if applicable. <br />ii. Allowable side resistance (skin friction). <br />iii. Soil and rock input values for Lateral Load Pile Analysis Software, LPILE. <br />iv. Wincore or Gint boring logs. <br />Geotechnical analyses and recommendations for Mechanically Stabilized Earth <br />("MSE") retaining walls <br />i. Sliding and overturning <br />ii. Eccentricity <br />iii. Bearing pressure <br /> <br />(b) <br /> <br />(c) <br /> <br />(d) <br />(e) <br /> <br />(f) <br /> <br />5 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.