Res 1992-008 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

. Recommendations for land use under noise exposure areas. . Identification of existing and unconstrained future land use patterns in the area adjacent to and surrounding the airport. . Utility and infrastructure costs. . Development of alternative corrpatibility schemes. . Recommendation of prefe"ed alternatives and development of a land use plan. The land use plan for the airport and its environs must be compatible with local comprehensive planning and will be coordinated with the objectives, poHcies and programs for the area. Tnk 6.3 Nolsll AIJII/y8I8 Based upon the level of flight activity and aircraft rrix developed in Task 4.0, Forecast of Aviation Demand, noise exposure contours will be prepared and used for alternatives analysis. The noise contours for the short, intermediate and long term time frame will be superimposed upon the airport and its environs and areas of potential incompatible use or excessive noise exposure will be identified. Special emphasis will be given to those areas which are cu"ently or anticipated to be developed for Incompatible uses. The noise analysis will be one of the principle considerations in the development of alternatives for any airfield expansion or changes in operational profile or procedures. A noise analysis utiHzing FAA Integrated Noise Model version 3.9 noise contours will be provided and utilized in the preparation of the Environmental Review described in Task 7.0. It will be necessary to review and evaluate existing plans, ordinances, and regulations to deterrrine local planning goals, objectives, and policies, and to determine app/icabiHty of local ordinances to ensure land use compatibility with the airport, and recommendations for City implementation. At least one public information meeting is required for this task. Task 6.4 PressntBtlon of Developed Alternatives to the City and FAA After alternatives have been developed, analyzed and evaluated by the consultant, at least three alternatives will be presented to the City, the FAA and other parties if necessary. The consultant will provide a working paper which presents the analysis and evaluation process, in a format that is objective and which will present a relative merits or disadvantages of each alternative presented. Upon selection of an alternative or alternatives for further development, the consultant will proceed with Task 6.6. Task 6.5 Schedules and Estimate. of Cost for Recommendecl. Developmem As an extension of the development and recommendation of airport development alternatives, the consultants will prepare estimates of capital investments along with a schedule of improvements proposed in the master plan. The development schedules will based upon the short, intermediate and long term needs as developed in the master plan and will based upon the role assessment and development of alternative plans. There will be an analysis of possible funding sources including general obHgation bonds, revenue bonds, federal funding sources and the possible infusion of private funding for certain airport improvements. Existing airport management policies and practices (as they effect airport revenues) will be reviewed and considered in the context of anticipated future airport needs and the costs to develop irrprovements. Task 6.6 Developmem of Selective Alternatives Upon the colTpletion of Task 6.5 and direction by the City to proceed, the consultants will develop the