Res 1991-088 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

Detailed design within development areas will not be included in the master plan; however, it is anticipated that at least the following items will be addressed: . Land required for existing and future aviation needs, specifically general aviation, and fixed base operations. . Recommendations for land use under noise exposure areas. . Identification of existing and unconstrained future land use patterns in the area adjacent to and surrounding the airport. . Utility and infrastructure costs. . Development of alternative compatibility schemes. . Recommendation of preferred alternatives and development of a land use plan. The land use plan for the airport and its environs must be compatible with local comprehensive planning and will be coordinated with the objectives, policies and programs for the area. Task 6.3 Noise Analysis Based upon the level of flight activity and aircraft mix developed in Task 4.0, Forecast of Aviation Demand, noise exposure contours will be prepared and used for alternatives analysis. The noise contours will be superimposed upon the airport and its environs and areas of potential incompatible use or excessive noise exposure will be identified. Special emphasis will be given to those areas which are currently or anticipated to be developed for incompatible uses. The noise analysis will be one of the principle considerations in the development of alternatives for any airfield expansion or changes in operational profile or procedures. A noise analysis utilizing FAA Integrated Noise Model version 3.9 noise contours will be provided and utilized in the preparation of the Environmental Review described in Task 7.0. It will be necessary to review and evaluate existing plans, ordinances, and regulations to determine local planning goals, objectives, and policies, and to determine applicability of local ordinances to ensure land use compatibility with the airport. Task 6.4 Presentation of Developed Alternatives to the City and FAA After alternatives have been developed, analyzed and evaluated by the consultant, at least three alternatives will be presented to the City, the TDA, the FAA and other parties if necessary. The consultant will provide a working paper which presents the analysis and evaluation process, in a format that is objective and which will present a relative merits or disadvantages of each alternative presented. Upon selection of an alternative or alternatives for further development, the consultant will proceed with Task 6.6. Task 6.5 Schedules and Estimates of Cost for Recommended Development As an extension of the development and recommendation of airport development alternatives, the consultants will prepare estimates of capital investments along with a schedule of improvements proposed in the master plan. The development schedules will based upon the short, intermediate and long term needs as developed in the master plan and will based upon the role assessment and development of alternative plans. There wíll be an analysis of possible funding sources including general obligation bonds, revenue bonds, federal funding sources and the possible infusion of private funding for certain airport improvements. Existing airport management policies and practices (as they effect airport revenues) will be reviewed and considered in the context of antidpated future airport needs and the costs to develop improvements.