My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Res 1991-088
San-Marcos
>
City Clerk
>
03 Resolutions
>
1990 s
>
1991
>
Res 1991-088
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/19/2007 10:34:45 AM
Creation date
7/19/2007 10:34:45 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Clerk
City Clerk - Document
Resolutions
City Clerk - Type
Agreement
Number
1991-88
Date
7/22/1991
Volume Book
103
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
22
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />Task 6.6 Development of Selective Alternatives <br />Upon the completion of Task 6.5 and direction by the City to proceed, the consultants will develop the <br />presentation material for the alternative or alternatives selected. The consultant will prepare presentations <br />for the City Commissioners and staffs and for public information meetings to be conducted or offered to <br />neighborhood areas surrounding the airport for their consideration. <br />TASK 7.0 - ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW <br />Since it appears that major airport improvements such as runway extensions or others that require full <br />environmental impact assessment will not result from the proposed study, an environmental review of long <br />term airport development program will be conducted to identity any potential impacts that may result from <br />the proposed development program. Full consideration will be given to those factors which may result from <br />airport improvement and analyzed under current FAA and other State or Federal guidelines. This will <br />ensure that should the environmental consequences of any recommended or planned improvement be <br />questioned that information would be available for consideration. Unless required by the FAA, no field <br />surveys for biological (flora and fauna) or archaeological assessment will be conducted; however, Hterature <br />searches will be undertaken. Similarly, no noise or air quality monitoring will be conducted. <br />New noise contours based upon updated aircraft activity forecasts will be provided if determined to be <br />necessary, as will updated air quality analysis if required. <br />The environmental review will address at least the following environmental consequences: <br />. Noise <br />. Compatible Land Use <br />. Assessment of Social Impacts <br />. Induced Socioeconomic Impacts <br />. Air Quality <br />. Water Quality <br />. Department of Transportation, Section 4 (F) <br />. Biotic Communities (Including Both Flora and Fauna) <br />. Endangered and Threatened Species of Flora and Fauna <br />. Historical and Archaeological Impact <br />. Wetlands and Floodplains <br />TASK 8.0 - AIRPORT LA YOUT PLAN <br />Task 8.1 AJrpon Layout Plan <br />The existing airport layout plan will be revised and updated in accordance with the developed and accepted <br />alternatives for the airport improvement program. All recommendations for development that have been <br />accepted or approved by the City and the FAA as a result of this study will be incorporated in the airport <br />layout plan update. The ALP will contain information as required under FAA Advisory Circular 150/5070-6, <br />it wiIJ superimposed over the most recently available aerial photography for purposes of providing detailed <br />visual reference to airport facilities and features as well as the environs. <br />Task 8.2 Prepare New Height Hazard Zoning Maps <br />Using the Federal Air Regulation Part 77 as the basis for delineation, a new map will be prepared showing <br />the heights and relative locations of airspace limitations for the construction of obstructions in the vicinity <br />of the airport. The map will utilize the technical requirements of FAR Part 77 as its principle basis; <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.