Laserfiche WebLink
<br /> 2 <br /> INTRODUCTION <br />Senate Bill 336 (SB336) was originally adopted June 20, 1987, and <br />has been codified as Chapter 395, Texas Local Government Code. <br />The law applies to fees for water, sewer, storm water, and <br />drainage and flood control, and permanent local roads. San <br />Marcos has changed such fees for water and wastewter since 1984. <br />The state law requires compliance by June 20, 1990 in order to <br />continue to assess and collect impact fees. <br />Impact fees (previously known in San Marcos as capital recovery <br />fees) are a method for cities to help fund major off-site <br />facilities through fees assessed and collected from new <br />development. Over a period of time fee revenues accumulate and <br />can be used for cash funding of capital improvement expansions. <br />Impact fees are popular with many cities and towns because they <br />can be used to reduce the need for utility rate or tax increases <br />necessitated by increased bond financing. Impact fees also <br />diversify the sources of infrastructure financing and can help <br />improve municipal bond ratings. <br />Cities are required to develop planning information and a capital <br />improvements program (CIP) on which the fees are based, and to <br />hold public hearings prior to enacting a fee ordinance. The law <br />also contains penalty provisions for non-compliance and for <br />overcharges. <br />Of critical concern now is the pending deadline for updating <br />impact fees. If existing fee programs are not brought into <br />compliance with by June 20, 1990, they may be subject to <br />challenge as illegal fees, thus jeopardizing all impact fee <br />revenues from that time forward. <br />GENERAL GUIDELINES FOR IMPACT FEES <br />The reasonableness of impact fees is usually determined by the <br />"rational nexus test". The major tenets of the rational nexus <br />test are as follows: <br />1. An impact fee is a valid exercise of municipal police <br /> power if the fee is primarily regulatory, i. e., there must <br /> be a reasonable connection between the need for additional <br /> facilities and the growth resulting from new development <br /> (impact fees cannot be used to improve existing facilities <br /> to a level which is necessary to support existing <br /> development, or for maintenance); <br />2. The fees charged must not exceed a pr~portionate share of <br /> the cost incurred or to be incurred in accommodating <br /> development paying the fee (it becomes an invalid tax when <br />